The Communication of Inductive Inferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a new approach to communication between agents that perform inductive inference. Consider a community of agents where each agent has a limited view of the overall world. When an agent in this community induces a hypothesis about the world, it necessarily reflects that agent’s partial view of the world. If an agent communicates a hypothesis to another agent, and that hypothesis is in conflict with the receiving agent’s view of the world, then the receiving agent has to modify or discard the hypothesis. Previous systems have used voting methods or theory refinement techniques to integrate these partial hypotheses. However, these mechanisms risk destroying parts of the hypothesis that are correct. Our proposal is that an agent should communicate the bounds of an induced hypothesis, along with the hypothesis itself. These bounds allow the hypotheses to be judged in the context from which they were formed. This paper examines using version space boundary sets to represent these bounds. Version space boundary sets may be manipulated using set operations. These operations can be used to evaluate and integrate multiple partial hypotheses. We describe a simple implementation of this approach, and draw some conclusions on its practicality. Finally, we describe a tentative set of KQML operators for communicating hypotheses and their bounds.
منابع مشابه
Ph.D. Thesis Proposal: The Communication of Inductive Inferences
We propose a new approach to communication between agents that perform inductive inference. Previous systems have used methods based on voting strategies or theory refinement to integrate multiple learned models. Our approach uses version spaces as a medium for the inter-agent communication of inductive inferences. This allows multiple models to be integrated using the principle of set intersec...
متن کاملCommunicating Inductive Inferences In Agent Societies
Our work was motivated by a lack of support for machine learning capabilities in agent communication languages such as KQML, Agent-0 and FIPA. The requirements were that such any extension to these communication languages should allow heterogeneous inductive algorithms to interact on a principled, consistent basis and that the inductive inferences being communicated should not be able to introd...
متن کاملTowards a Logical Model of Induction from Examples and Communication
This paper focuses on a logical model of induction, and specifically of the common machine learning task of inductive concept learning (ICL). We define an inductive derivation relation, which characterizes which hypothesis can be induced from sets of examples, and show its properties. Moreover, we will also consider the problem of communicating inductive inferences between two agents, which cor...
متن کاملMultiagent Inductive Learning: an Argumentation-based Approach
Multiagent Inductive Learning is the problem that groups of agents face when they want to perform inductive learning, but the data of interest is distributed among them. This paper focuses on concept learning, and presents A-MAIL, a framework for multiagent induction integrating ideas from inductive learning, case-based reasoning and argumentation. Argumentation is used as a communication frame...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Effect Adding an Active Feedback Network with an Inductive behavior to a Common-Gate Topology as a Transimpedance Amplifier for Low-Power and Wide-Band Communication Applications
Common Gate (CG) topologies are commonly used as the first stage in Transimpedance Amplifiers (TIA), due to their low input resistance. But, this structure is not solely used as a TIA and comes with other topologies such as differential amplifiers or negative resistances and capacitances. This paper deals with analyzing the effect of adding an active feedback network to a common gate topology...
متن کاملInductive selectivity and integration of information from multiple sources
Inductive selectivity is well-documented: when people make inductive inferences from categorical premises, they reason differently about intrinsic versus contextual properties. However, the mechanism yielding this pattern remains unknown. We examined how people integrate knowledge about given premise categories with their knowledge about properties when they generate inductive inferences. By va...
متن کامل